- 20
-
John tracked down its membership names and they revealed
that some of Jack Scott's female relatives - including
his mother - were members of the Guild, and had attended
its functions.
Yet,
despite the fact that Frieda, in her - largely useless
- account of their time in Australia, had mentioned that
they had met a "young Army captain" on the Malwa
who had told them that in France the sound of the rain
on the roofs of the trenches had reminded him of his iron-roofed
home in Sydney, try as we may - and I can assure you we
tried very, very hard - we could find no significant connection,
direct or indirect, between Captain Bertie Scrivener and
Jack Scott's secret army.
(I was later told by someone close to the secret army
- Ernest Whiting, in fact - that "the women"
were not told what "the men" were up to.)
However,
this is probably an opportune moment to explain my "largely
useless" comment, interpolated above.
According to Frieda's account of their time in Australia
- which she recorded 12 years afterwards in Not I But
the Wind [Heinemann, London 1935] - she and Lawrence,
soon after they arrived in Sydney...
...went to Sydney's Central Railway station; got on a
train (with "all our trunks"); travelled south
"looking out the window" for somewhere to stay;
"got out where it looks nice" - which happened
to be Thirroul, about 50 miles south of Sydney; and where,
an hour or so later, they were settled "in a beautiful
bungalow on the sea" (which happened to be "Wyewurk",
more than half a mile from Thirroul station).
Frieda's account is nonsense. Lawrence was too sensible
and experienced a traveller to do such a silly thing as
to fetch up, some time after 4pm on a Monday afternoon,
in a place of which he knew nothing, and where he knew
nobody, and from where it is unlikely he could have returned
to Sydney that day.
Nor is there any way two strangers could have, after getting
out of a train at Thirroul, found "a beautiful bungalow
on the sea" (a good 10-minute walk from the station
- and which had yet to be cleaned after the previous tenants
had vacated it) and been settled in there before nightfall...even
if they had all their trunks with them (which they didn't).
When, more than 10 years later, Richard Aldington was
trying to piece together the truth about Lawrence and
Kangaroo, his Australian informant Adrian Lawlor
(see below) suggested that he might ask Frieda about what
had happened in Australia. He replied:
Your
suggestion that I should apply to Frieda for information
about Australia (or anything else) shows a most happy
ignorance of that highwellbornone's nature. In answer
to my letter [asking for information] she ordered
me to say that L. is the successor of Augustine and
Francis of Assisi and "has no place amongst English
novelists"...It is useless to ask Frieda, she
has the memory, not like a sieve, but a bottomless
bucket. That book of hers [Not I But the Wind], apart
from letters [her book contained many Lawrence letters]
consists almost wholly of things she was reminded
of by Pino [Lawrence's publisher in Florence], David
Garnett, Huxley and myself. |
When
Frieda herself came to write her account of their time
in Australia, her recollection of what happened was not
strong: "...as I look back," she wrote in Not
I But the Wind, "it's all vague to me...the days
slipped by like dreams...".
No, Frieda is not a reliable source for information about
what occurred while she and Lawrence were in Australia.
In the end,
Ruffels and I decided, with the utmost reluctance, and
after a great deal of intensive research, particularly
on John's part, that the Scrivener "lead" was
a dead-end, and that his was not in fact the "name
on the boat that brought Lawrence to Sydney" which,
we had been told, was the link between Lawrence and the
secret army.
Captain Bertie Scrivener, we came to believe, was just
another example of how interconnected this echelon of
Sydney society was in 1922.
|
|
|